Someone listed a G4 locally on FB Marketplace and I fortunately caught it quickly, since it had the Zip750 drive with face plate. It allowed me to complete my PowerMac G3/G3 tower collection (not every iteration, but every design) with Zip drives. Unfortunately, I haven't been able to get it to read a Zip 100 disk (I know it cannot write the disks, but was hoping it would be able to read).
Also, it turned out to be a faster version than the one I had. My old MDD was a dual 866MHz, and this one is the dual 1GHz. So not I've got it nicely set up with 2GB RAM, a 60 GB IDE SSD, DVD-RW drive, the Zip 750, an Airport card for wifi, and a SCSI card (not used at the moment).
So, the question is, would a solid state SCSI solution BlueSCSI v2 be faster than the IDE SSD? I have it set up to run Tiger, Sorbet Leopard, and 9.2.2 at the moment. Like the fact it can still boot OS 9 directly, so the goal is to make this one my top of the line OS 9 machine. I've got some BlueSCSIs in other machines, but if I can eek more performance on this machine, I'd prefer to use it here, and throw a v1 BlueSCSI in the older machines.
Also, it turned out to be a faster version than the one I had. My old MDD was a dual 866MHz, and this one is the dual 1GHz. So not I've got it nicely set up with 2GB RAM, a 60 GB IDE SSD, DVD-RW drive, the Zip 750, an Airport card for wifi, and a SCSI card (not used at the moment).
So, the question is, would a solid state SCSI solution BlueSCSI v2 be faster than the IDE SSD? I have it set up to run Tiger, Sorbet Leopard, and 9.2.2 at the moment. Like the fact it can still boot OS 9 directly, so the goal is to make this one my top of the line OS 9 machine. I've got some BlueSCSIs in other machines, but if I can eek more performance on this machine, I'd prefer to use it here, and throw a v1 BlueSCSI in the older machines.