Cracked Hinge on Mac Portable

JDW

Administrator
Staff member
Founder
Sep 2, 2021
2,402
1,916
113
54
Japan
youtube.com
Two questions for my fellow Portable owners, including @techknight

Question 1: What is the step-by-step procedure to clean and lube stiff hinges?

Question 2: My Portable’s screen was always hard to open, requiring me to press very hard on the right side of the handle to open it. Tonight I learned why. My right side hinge is cracked open as shown below. I have 24-hour Cure JB Weld epoxy. Is that enough to fix this? Any advice?

IMG_7569.jpeg

IMG_7568.jpeg

IMG_7567.jpeg

IMG_7566.jpeg


Video:

 

MeTheMac

New Tinkerer
Feb 20, 2025
69
14
8
Mars
I had this issue as well. I could find zero info on it at all and its like my precious machine lol.
I decided the best option for me was to carefully apply some superglue made for ABS plastics but this hasn't worked great. I would love to hear what people have to say since at the moment I'm just keeping it open for the time being.
 
  • Sad
Reactions: JDW

Paolo B

Tinkerer
Nov 27, 2021
299
180
43
Switzerland
First off, I would disassemble the Portable, in order to have a more freedom to operate.
The Portable was famously designed to be disassembled by hand, no tool needed.
I am afraid just glueing may not suffice, as - obviously - the hinge got fractured along the line of maximum mechanical stress.
As you need to counter flexural forces, you may consider gluing the broken bit and then drilling from the top along the 5 reinforcing ribs.
Finally, plugging the holes by glueing in place some thin metal pins for reinforcing the assembly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JDW

MeTheMac

New Tinkerer
Feb 20, 2025
69
14
8
Mars
First off, I would disassemble the Portable, in order to have a more freedom to operate.
The Portable was famously designed to be disassembled by hand, no tool needed.
I am afraid just glueing may not suffice, as - obviously - the hinge got fractured along the line of maximum mechanical stress.
As you need to counter flexural forces, you may consider gluing the broken bit and then drilling from the top along the 5 reinforcing ribs.
Finally, plugging the holes by glueing in place some thin metal pins for reinforcing the assembly.
Honestly, at the point I'm drilling through plastic on such a hard to find machine I'd rather just sacrifice daily closing-and-opening of the lid. The glue definitely is not enough -- it'd be awesome if we could manufacture some more of those assemblies. (call to the 3D modeling geniuses)
 
  • Like
Reactions: JDW

JDW

Administrator
Staff member
Founder
Sep 2, 2021
2,402
1,916
113
54
Japan
youtube.com
@Paolo B
I greatly appreciate your time to offer some thoughts.

Those ribs are tiny. Drilling top-down into them for the sake of inserting a metal rib (the source of which is currently unknown) is scary to me, personally because the size of the drill but would need to be super tiny. The required drill bit would be so tiny in fact that I wonder if the insert of even titanium metal rods would hold. Again, this is me assuming that the advice give was to drill inside the plastic ribs from the top-down. But I could have misread you on that.



Last night, prior to posting this thread, I had a multi-hour session with ChatGPT, primarily because I have a hard time getting feedback from the brilliant folk who are most informed about the Portable (well, folks other than you, Paolo). ChatGPT is the best I can do without human advice.

I discussed with ChatGPT all the details of the matter, which require the AI to have an understanding of how the Portable is constructed and the plastics being Polycarbonate, and the fact the machine is quite old. I also mentioned that I have the original 24-hour-cure JB Weld which is a very strong material when fully hardened.

ChatGPT claimed to understand the forces applied to the hinge and then told me that neither SuperGlue nor any kind of Epoxy would really fit the bill. It suggested a glue that basically dissolves plastic in order to "weld" the broken pieces together.

Specifically, ChatGPT told this:

If you want a structural, lasting repair, Methyl Methacrylate Adhesive (MMA) or a solvent-welding polycarbonate adhesive is far superior. MMA chemically fuses the plastic; epoxy only grips the surface.

✅ Why JB Weld Is Not Ideal for Polycarbonate

Original JB Weld (the 24-hour steel-reinforced epoxy) does NOT bond well to polycarbonate.
  • Polycarbonate is smooth, low-porosity, and chemically resistant.
  • Epoxy forms only a surface bond, not a chemical one.
  • Under hinge stress (opening/closing the LCD), epoxy repairs almost always fail over time, typically by peeling off the plastic rather than the plastic cracking again.
It may hold for a short while if perfectly clamped, but it is not a structural PC hinge fix.

✅ What Actually Works: MMA (Methyl Methacrylate Adhesive)

MMA chemically melts/fuses polycarbonate, creating a repair close to the strength of the original plastic. This is why it's used in motorcycle fairings, PC machine guards, and certain automotive plastics.
Benefits:
  • Creates a chemical weld rather than a glue layer
  • Very strong shear and peel strength
  • Fills small gaps
  • Bonds even aged polycarbonate
This is the best repair chemistry for your case.

Oh sure, but where can I find that in product form! So I did a long back-and-forth because I didn't believe its suggestions were accurate. I asked for things I could buy in Japan, and it then turns around and suggests these 2-part Epoxy products of all things:
  1. Cemedine Metal Lock AY-123
  2. 3M Scotch Weld DP8805NS (expensive)
I then did more back-and-forth with ChatGPT because I didn't trust its suggestion above. Am I about to pay big bucks for Scotch Weld, having no idea if it's really best or even contains the very "MMA" ChatGPT earlier said is needed to weld/bond/metal the broken pieces together?

I then Googled up a Reddit thread where some "random guy from the internet" said to fix broken polycarbonate at a high stress area, one must use SCIGRIP 16. So that set me on another discussion journey with ChatGPT, resulting in a product named...
The stuff is toxic, causes cancer, and even has shipping restrictions on it, which is why I was surprised a tube made its way to be found on Amazon Japan at any price.

ChatGPT then reviewed our previous dialog and give me this summary if its conclusions...

📌 What That Means for Polycarbonate Repair

Polycarbonate (PC) reacts differently to these chemicals:
1️⃣ MEK
  • Softens PC surface
  • Provides some weld action
  • Can cause stress cracking if overapplied

2️⃣ Methylene Chloride

  • Attacks PC more aggressively
  • Makes surface tacky very quickly
  • Creates a brittle layer if the material is old
  • Risk of “crazing”

3️⃣ MMA Monomer

  • Useful — but in Weld-On 16 it’s a minor component, not a full-strength MMA adhesive
  • Adds gap-filling ability
  • Adds strength, but not structural strength like a 2-part MMA cartridge

4️⃣ Methyl Acetate

  • Just a fast solvent to thin and help capillary penetration

🟩 So, Does Weld-On 16 Work on Polycarbonate?

Yes — it will bond polycarbonate.
Better than JB Weld, better than super glue.
It does:
  • Surface melting
  • Solvent welding
  • Filling the crack with cured acrylic resin
BUT…

🟥 Is it strong enough for a Macintosh Portable hinge?

Not reliably.
Your hinge sees:
  • high torque
  • high shear
  • repeated cycles
  • stress on old, brittle PC
Weld-On 16 is:
  • stronger than JB Weld on PC
  • stronger than pure solvent
  • but weaker and more brittle than true 2-part MMA adhesives
Under hinge loads, the crack may:
  • re-crack along the edge of the weld
  • propagate next to the solvent-affected area
  • fail after repeated opening/closing
If you simply apply Weld-On 16 to the crack and reassemble the hinge:
👉 It will look good; it may hold for a while;
but long-term durability is questionable.

🟦 Best-case scenario with Weld-On 16

If you reinforce the hinge internally (thin steel/aluminum strip epoxied or screwed inside), AND use Weld-On 16:
✔ Will likely last long-term
✔ Good fusion + added mechanical strength
✔ Much better than epoxy alone
If you use Weld-On 16 alone:
⚠ Might fail within months or even weeks

🟧 If you want an adhesive that definitely survives hinge loads:

You want a true 2-part structural MMA, not a solvent cement.
Examples (all bond PC extremely well and remain flexible enough under stress):
  • 3M DP8005
  • 3M DP8010 Blue
  • 3M DP8805NS
  • Konishi メタルロック AY-123 (Japan)
These are chemically different:
They do not rely on solvents — they polymerize into a tough, shock-resistant structural material.

🟦 Final Recommendation (Very Direct)

If your choice is between:

  • JB Weld❌ terrible for polycarbonate
  • Methylene chloride alone❌ too brittle
  • Weld-On 16 → ✔ decent, workable
  • 2-part MMA⭐ best, longest-lasting, hinge-safe

So:

Weld-On 16 is acceptable,
❗ but not optimal,
⭐ unless combined with mechanical reinforcement.


I then told ChatGPT to compare the ingredients of its recommended Cemedine and 3M Scotch Guard Epoxies with the SCIGRIP Weld-ON 16 to confirm Absolutely what is best and what I can actually buy here in Japan. ChatGPT responded:

Practical recommendation for a cracked polycarbonate hinge (your situation)

  • If the goal is a single-product chemical repair that actually fuses polycarbonate, the solvent-type (Weld-On/SCIGRIP 16 or similar MMA/DCM formulas) is usually the best single-product result because it chemically melts the polymer and merges the crack surfaces. That gives very strong, low-gap bonds — but methylene chloride is toxic and may cause stress-cracking or surface whitening (crazing) if mis-applied. If you go this route, do it outdoors or in a fume hood, use nitrile gloves + respirator (organic vapor) and mask nearby surfaces.

  • If you want a safer / more robust structural repair with better long-term fatigue performance, use a two-part structural adhesive plus mechanical reinforcement: e.g. 3M DP-460 (epoxy) or 3M DP-8005/DP-8805 (structural acrylate) and add a small internal reinforcement (stainless pin/dowel, a tiny metal or carbon fiber strap bonded along the hinge, or a glued-in sleeve). Epoxy + mechanical reinforcement will tolerate repeated opening/closing better than a brittle glue line alone. Epoxy is less likely to chemically attack or craze the polycarbonate, but you must prepare (clean, roughen) the surfaces.

  • Cemedine AY-123: it’s an acrylic two-part product aimed at metal/CFRP. Manufacturer notes: “may be difficult to bond some plastics or painted metal” — so I would not pick AY-123 as the first choice for polycarbonate hinge repair unless you can confirm adhesion to your specific polycarbonate. (SDS confirms it’s a methacrylate-type chemistry, not a polycarbonate solvent weld.)

Safety & technique notes (do these or the repair will fail)

  • If using Weld-On/SCIGRIP 16: extreme ventilation, nitrile gloves, goggles, and preferably an organic-vapor respirator. Apply in very small amounts (needle applicator) at the crack, clamp until cured. Expect some surface finish change — practice on scrap if possible. (SDS warnings: methylene chloride = serious hazard.)

  • If using 3M epoxy (DP-460/DP-420): roughen both sides with very fine sandpaper, clean with isopropyl alcohol, clamp, and consider embedding a small stainless pin or backing plate for load transfer. Epoxy cures stronger when mixed precisely and can be accelerated by gentle heating per manufacturer instructions.

Final, direct answer to your original (and follow-up) questions

  • Was I wrong to mention AY-123 earlier? Not “wrong” — AY-123 is a high-strength two-part acrylic and can be strong — but it is not a solvent MMA weld and the manufacturer specifically warns about plastics being sometimes difficult to bond. For polycarbonate hinge work, AY-123 is not the first choice. The SDS proves AY-123 is methacrylate-based (see above).

  • Is SCIGRIP / Weld-On 16 really methylene-chloride / MEK / MMA? Yes — older/current SDS/TDS show methylene chloride + MEK + methyl acetate + small MMA monomer; many product pages state the formula and that it dissolves acrylic and can bond polycarbonate. That’s why it’s commonly recommended for plastic “welds.” Strongest single-product fix but hazardous.

  • Are 3M Scotch-Weld epoxies “better” than Weld-On 16? They are different: epoxies give strong structural bonds and are safer to handle in normal environments; they do not solvent-weld the plastic, so success depends on surface prep and reinforcement. For a hinge under repeated mechanical stress, epoxy + reinforcement is the most robust long-term solution if you cannot or will not use solvent welds.

Would love to hear thoughts regarding the above. Yes, I know it's a lot to dig through, but again, it's actually only a small part of the larger dialog I had with ChatGPT.
 

phunguss

Active Tinkerer
Dec 24, 2023
490
420
63
57
Stillwater, MN
I have done some research when thinking about creating my own acrylic case for a mini-cube... and that led me to Weld-on 4.
Weld-on4.jpg

I haven't opened it and tried it yet, but now that I look at the label, it has maybe some good things to work on poly-carbonate and not just clear acrylic.
Weldon4-warning.jpg


Weld-on 4 vs 16 in aquarium talks and a video about hazards.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JDW

JDW

Administrator
Staff member
Founder
Sep 2, 2021
2,402
1,916
113
54
Japan
youtube.com
@phunguss
I greatly appreciate your input!

Luckily, both 4 & 16 are sold on Amazon Japan, although 4 is more expensive than 16 because it comes in a larger quantity can.

I asked ChatGPT to compare ingredients and tell me which provides the best weld for Polycarbonate — an important consideration since Weld-ON is often used for Acrylic instead. ChatGPT told me the following:

Short summary / quick answer

  • Weld-On 16 is the better single-product choice for a cracked polycarbonate hinge — it is a medium-bodied solvent cement that contains more aggressive solvents plus some methyl-methacrylate monomer, so it both dissolves and deposits MMA-type resin in the joint, producing a stronger weld on PC than Weld-On 4 in typical use.
  • Weld-On 4 is thinner (water-thin) and primarily formulated for acrylic (PMMA); legacy formulations contained DCM/TCE (very aggressive), but current “DCM & TCE Free” variants use other solvents and are optimized for acrylic sheet fabrication, not structural PC hinge repairs. Use 4 only for optical, butt joints in acrylic or when you need a very thin seam — not for hinge load.

Weld-On 16 (SCIGRIP / IPS) — typical SDS / TDS ingredients

  • Methylene chloride (dichloromethane) — often a major solvent in older formulas (listed 50–75% in some SDSs).
  • Methyl ethyl ketone (MEK).
  • Methyl acetate.
  • Methyl methacrylate (MMA) monomer (stabilized) — present as monomer/filler to polymerize/leave acrylic in the joint.
  • Some modern “16” listings claim DCM & TCE-free reformulations and may use other aggressive solvents (trans-dichloroethylene or other replaced solvents) — check the SDS for the shipped batch.

Weld-On 4 (SCIGRIP / IPS) — typical SDS / TDS ingredients

  • Methylene chloride (DCM) and historically trichloroethylene (TCE) in legacy formulae.
  • Methyl methacrylate (MMA) monomer (small amounts).
  • Newer Weld-On 4 DCM & TCE-FREE variants substitute safer solvents (formulated to avoid DCM/TCE) and are very low-viscosity “soak” cements for acrylic. These are optimized for optical clarity and butt joints in PMMA, not for heavy hinge loads.

What those ingredient differences mean in practice

  1. Body / viscosity / penetration
    • Weld-On 4 = water-thin, very low viscosity — excellent for “soak” butt joints on acrylic sheets, makes seamless joins, but less gap-filling and less body to bridge cracks under shear.
    • Weld-On 16 = medium-bodied, better gap-filling and creates a thicker welded bead inside the crack — useful for filling and giving mechanical support inside a crack.
  2. Solvent aggressiveness and chemical weld
    • Both (legacy formulas) include DCM, which is highly aggressive and will dissolve plastic deeply. Weld-On 16’s combination of DCM + MEK + MMA monomer is formulated to both aggressively soften and then leave an MMA-rich deposit that cures, producing a strong joint on PC & PMMA.
  3. Suitability to polycarbonate
    • Weld-On 16 is explicitly recommended for polycarbonate in manufacturer TDS/SDS references (used for polycarbonate, ABS, PVC, etc.). It generally produces stronger bonds on PC than Weld-On 4 in shop practice.
    • Weld-On 4 was designed primarily for acrylic (PMMA) and is optimized for optical clarity in butt joints; it is not the best first choice when the substrate is thick, aged polycarbonate under torque.
  4. Hazard profile
    • Both classic formulations include methylene chloride, a significant health hazard (carcinogen, CNS effects). Newer “DCM-free” options replace it, but alternative solvents may still be hazardous (MEK, trans-dichloroethylene, etc.). If you handle either, you must use good PPE and ventilation.

If you buy Weld-On 16

Budget for PPE: organic-vapor respirator (cartridge for chlorinated solvents), nitrile gloves, goggles, and perform the work outdoors or with a fume extractor. DCM exposure is serious.
 
  • Like
Reactions: phunguss

phunguss

Active Tinkerer
Dec 24, 2023
490
420
63
57
Stillwater, MN
Regardless of the method you use to repair this hinge, you may want to completely disassemble so it so you have that sole piece isolated when you do the repair. It may also be helpful to try to make a mold of it in case you want to recast the part. How? There are plenty of methods that would be another whole ChatGPT conversation.
 

MeTheMac

New Tinkerer
Feb 20, 2025
69
14
8
Mars
Regardless of the method you use to repair this hinge, you may want to completely disassemble so it so you have that sole piece isolated when you do the repair. It may also be helpful to try to make a mold of it in case you want to recast the part. How? There are plenty of methods that would be another whole ChatGPT conversation.
Side note: anyone who wants to make a mold, count me in. I'm willing to pay the price for such a thing, as I'm sure many would
 

JDW

Administrator
Staff member
Founder
Sep 2, 2021
2,402
1,916
113
54
Japan
youtube.com
OK, well...
While I ponder the toxic and cancer-causing risks of Weld-On 16, I'd like to go back to my Question #1 of my opening post, which no one has touched on yet. And maybe nobody replied to Q1 because no Portable owner has ever considered lubing the two removable hinge parts? @techknight mentioned re-lubing his hinges in his video here at 23:29, but disassembled them and lubed off-camera, so I'm not sure the best way to go about that.

Oh, and he also talks about his Portable's broken hinge for the first time at 8:16. He also used one kind of Epoxy (he didn't say what) to attempt a hinge repair initially at 12:32, but later at 45:48 he shows his epoxy job cracked and he had to redo it and his redo was permanent, meaning that removable hinge on the right side can now never be removed or re-lubed, I guess.

Anyway...

The stock hinges (the two removable pieces) had grease in them originally, as per TechKnight.

Maybe the reason this right side hinge on my Portable snapped is because the grease had frozen up and put more force on the plastic, causing it to snap.

Makes no sense to proceed with a toxic hinge fix if the same thing might happen again due to frozen up grease. But it's not clear to me how to disassemble the two removable hinge parts in order to apply grease.

Any of your Portable owners know? @Paolo B ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Paolo B

jmacz

Tinkerer
Mar 21, 2025
83
92
18
I don’t have a Portable. Too scared of tunnel vision to ever look into acquiring one.

But if I were in that position, I would machine out of metal (or possibly 3D print with abs) four hour glass / black widow shaped pieces, cut similar sized shapes into that hinge (between the ribs) using a dremel, press the four pieces in there to close the crack and keep it closed, and epoxy to keep those pieces in place. The shape would be strong enough to keep the crack closed that way you don’t have to rely on the glue by itself. Think of it as a staple.
 

Paolo B

Tinkerer
Nov 27, 2021
299
180
43
Switzerland
Those ribs are tiny. Drilling top-down into them for the sake of inserting a metal rib (the source of which is currently unknown) is scary to me, personally because the size of the drill but would need to be super tiny. The required drill bit would be so tiny in fact that I wonder if the insert of even titanium metal rods would hold. Again, this is me assuming that the advice give was to drill inside the plastic ribs from the top-down. But I could have misread you on that.

I did a similar intervention on a HP712 top lid. It’s not for the faint of heart, but doable. With the help of a bench drill, which can ensure accurate positioning and steady drilling, surely doable. As for the reinforcing rod, the drill bit itself. A 0.8 mm can probably do the job. I would consider 5 inserts, as with the ribs. If well executed totally invisible. Stuff for dentists, though, no doubts.
As for disassembling the hinges, the service manual of the Portable offers a step by step guide on how to safely take it apart. No tool needed.
Finally, the hinges are designed to offer some friction, don’t know if lubricating them makes really sense.
Personally, though, I would in case try to use the good old WD40.
 

joevt

Tinkerer
Mar 5, 2023
202
76
28
As for the reinforcing rod, the drill bit itself. A 0.8 mm can probably do the job. I would consider 5 inserts, as with the ribs.
Do 0.8 mm drill bits like bending forces or are they brittle in the non-vertical direction?
How wide are the ribs? How long are the ribs? We see the top of the rib. What's on the bottom of the rib (if you were to drill all the way through).
What does the hinge look like when fully opened and fully closed?
What are the clearances above, in front, and below the ribs?
Do these ribs belong to the hinge or do they just hold the hinge?
Do these ribs need to be flexible for the hinge to operate?

If there's room, use small bolts to tie the top of the ribs to the underside of the ribs. Add tensioning with washers/nuts/plates. Maybe remove some plastic to add room for the metal. The problem is, longer bolts are usually also wider.
 

JDW

Administrator
Staff member
Founder
Sep 2, 2021
2,402
1,916
113
54
Japan
youtube.com
Do 0.8 mm drill bits like bending forces or are they brittle in the non-vertical direction?
My experience with sub 1.0mm drill bits isn't good. They almost break when I look at them! :) Seriously, they aren't strong, and that's why I earlier said that even "titanium" at those diameters might not even be adequate.

How wide are the ribs? How long are the ribs? We see the top of the rib. What's on the bottom of the rib (if you were to drill all the way through).
HingeMeasurements.jpg

(Mitutoyo calipers used for all measurements.)

Underneath the 5 ribs is more plastic, almost as high as the ribs.

What does the hinge look like when fully opened and fully closed?
The crack is its WIDEST (about 1.25mm wide) when LCD is FULLY CLOSED.

tempImageSlqPWx.png

Crack is completely shut (cannot be seen) when LCD is fully opened.

tempImageJeZYRz.png

What are the clearances above, in front, and below the ribs?
Basically no clearance ABOVE or BELOW. And because the ribs are ANGLED, the clearance to the back (until you hit the metal HDD drive bracket) changes per the angle. But if I measure the clearance from the back of the ribs, at the base of the crack, I get 3.0mm until I hit the metal drive bracket.

Do these ribs belong to the hinge or do they just hold the hinge?
The ribs belong to the fixed and unmovable polycarbonate plastic main frame of the computer, which can be removed. But the moveable cylindrical hinges that fit into the ribbed part can be removed from the sides of the LCD. Watch this video at 7:59 to see how the cylindrical caps are removed from both sides. Then watch from 23:29 to see the cylindrical inner pieces removed, and soon after that he somehow breaks them apart to lube them.

Do these ribs need to be flexible for the hinge to operate?
No. They must be firm. The ribs exist to strengthen the fixed piece of plastic so it won't easily break. But in my case, it did break, right through the ribs.

If there's room, use small bolts to tie the top of the ribs to the underside of the ribs. Add tensioning with washers/nuts/plates. Maybe remove some plastic to add room for the metal. The problem is, longer bolts are usually also wider.
The word "bolts" means "machine screws" and means you normally need nuts and washers, but now that I've answered your previous questions, you can see that bolts aren't usable here. If you content they are, sketch your concept, shoot a photo, then upload it.

Now what may work, and what I think is perhaps less scary than doing what @paolo suggested would be to drill very shallow holes for self-tapping stainless steel screws to be placed at the BACK of the ribs, one screw on each side of the break. Then the screw wouldn't screw down flush with the ribs, leaving just enough room for a thin metal wire to be wrap around each screw, thereby pulling the screws toward each other. I still don't like drilling out these old plastics because 1.58mm at the narrowest point toward the top of the rub worries me a bit. But perhaps if the hinge could be welded using WELD-ON 16 (which again, I don't know if it even works), then the screw and wire idea might act as a reinforcement that would better ensure the weld won't break over time. Pure speculation on my part though. Not sure what's best.

But I will end this message saying this. When I start to CLOSE the lid, if I put the thumb of my right hand atop the ribs and press down REALLY HARD in an attempt to prevent that top piece from opening the crack, I simply cannot apply enough force to keep the top part down. Yeah... There's THAT much force applied when closing the lid. It's a lot!
 

phunguss

Active Tinkerer
Dec 24, 2023
490
420
63
57
Stillwater, MN
(Mitutoyo calipers used for all measurements.)

Underneath the 5 ribs is more plastic, almost as high as the ribs.
This makes me wonder if the ribs are actually structurally significant, or if the design was to just reduce plastic quatity and weight. If not structurally relevant, then a possibly solid filled model/mold/print could be created as a replacement that may be stronger than the original. Or if cast/milled in metal, obviously heavier, but much stronger.
 

JDW

Administrator
Staff member
Founder
Sep 2, 2021
2,402
1,916
113
54
Japan
youtube.com
...a possibly solid filled model/mold/print could be created as a replacement...
You mean recreate the entire main structural piece? It's a pretty complex frame, as you can see at right in tech knight's video at 11:34. Bruce Rayne shows it even more clearly in his video here. That main plastic structural piece is basically holding nearly everything except the keyboard and trackball.
 

phunguss

Active Tinkerer
Dec 24, 2023
490
420
63
57
Stillwater, MN
You mean recreate the entire main structural piece? It's a pretty complex frame, as you can see at right in tech knight's video at 11:34. Bruce Rayne shows it even more clearly in his video here. That main plastic structural piece is basically holding nearly everything except the keyboard and trackball.
Oh, wow! Yes, that is significant. Ease of disassembly, but difficult to replace/repair that complicated of a piece as a whole. :mad:
 
  • Like
Reactions: MeTheMac and JDW

Paolo B

Tinkerer
Nov 27, 2021
299
180
43
Switzerland
Those ribs are tiny. Drilling top-down into them for the sake if inserting a metal rib (the source of which is currently unknown) is scary to me, personally because the size of the drill but would need to be super tiny. The required drill bit would be so tiny in fact that I wonder if the insert of even titanium metal rods would hold. Again, this is me assuming that the advice give was to drill inside the plastic ribs from the top-down. But I could have misread you on that.

I did a similar intervention on a HP712 top lid. It’s not for the faint of heart, but doable. With the help of a bench drill, surely doable.
Or maybe even some thin and long screws could do the job.

As for disassembling the actual hinges, it’s super simple. Remove the cylindrical aesthetic cover, by just slightly rotating it for disengaging the retention pin and pulling it out sideways. That’s it on the panel side. On the chassis side, remove the plastic wedge-like pin that prevents the hinge from sliding out sideways. At that point you can remove the hinge/clutch.

IMG_0591.jpeg