Search results

  1. rdmark

    Netatalk 2.4.0 released

    Thank you! If anyone wants to lean in, the ticket is https://github.com/Netatalk/netatalk/issues/1204
  2. rdmark

    Netatalk 2.4.0 released

    From my perspective, your opinion as a user is the most valuable of all. :) I agree that macipgw not being updated for 9 years is worrying. It's unlikely to build cleanly on modern systems anymore. There are pros and cons to integrating macipgw into netatalk proper. Some practical concerns...
  3. rdmark

    Netatalk 2.4.0 released

    How do you imagine macipgw could be best incorporated with netatalk? What is the drawback of the current situation where macipgw is its own project that you can install and run if you need it? How would the user experience improve if the two projects were more closely integrated? I'm genuinely...
  4. rdmark

    Netatalk 2.4.0 released

    Continuing the saga of old-school encryption in Netatalk, we released version 2.4.2 today which addresses a licensing issue raised by the Debian project. As a result, we have reverted to relying on OpenSSL/LibreSSL with the bundled SSL provider... for the CAST algorithm only. This is only a...
  5. rdmark

    Netatalk 2.4.0 released

    Netatalk 2.4.1 has been released today! It contains a patch for a published CVE vulnerability, so it's recommended to upgrade your 2.x deployment, especially if serves a public IP. We also restore support for SLP (Server Location Protocol) in the Meson build system, for those who you like to...
  6. rdmark

    Netatalk 2.4.0 released

    Thanks for trying out netatalk, and for sharing your story! This is a valuable “newcomer” perspective that helps us continuously improve. Good job unblocking yourself. Do you remember exactly what the log messages said? And the full list of packages you installed to make it work? If libcrack...
  7. rdmark

    Netatalk 2.4.0 released

    The easiest way? Wait until the next PiSCSI release. ;) One trick you can do is to edit PiSCSI’s easyinstall.sh and update the line that defines the netatalk version number. Should be in the function called `installNetatalk()’. It should just work. But let me know if you try it and run into...
  8. rdmark

    Netatalk 2.4.0 released

    The Netatalk team is proud to present version 2.4.0 of the venerable AFP file sharing suite. Grab the source code, or a Docker image, today! This version is primarily a future-proofing release, introducing the modern Meson build system, while integrating an embedded WolfSSL as the encryption...
  9. rdmark

    Netatalk Issues

    FYI I edited your post to update the URL. I recently made some tweaks to the namings of those wiki pages. I'm pleased to hear that the installation guide worked for you!
  10. rdmark

    Netatalk Issues

    So regarding the webmin bug, using your examples I could find two corner case situations when data gets lost: 1) when editing a shared volume where the dir doesn't actually exist and 2) when editing a 1 or 2 line afpd.conf (i.e. when all the comment lines are removed.) I'll fix these in the...
  11. rdmark

    Netatalk Issues

    BTW a tip: you can put options on the DEFAULT line to avoid repeating them for every single shared volume. For instance: :DEFAULT: volsizelimit:2000 allow:alex
  12. rdmark

    Netatalk Issues

    Error -50 often means that the resource fork could not be created. Which in the context of netatalk likely means that file system permissions aren't allowing the creation of AppleDouble meta data files. The files that you are able to copy likely don't have resource forks in the first place...
  13. rdmark

    Netatalk Issues

    Oh no, sorry for the data loss! Would you be able to share with me your AppleVolumes.default file? There may be a bug in the parsing logic that I can fix if I know what the sequence of options are. Good to hear that the file sharing works now!
  14. rdmark

    Netatalk Issues

    You can try using the "options:limitsize" AppleVolumes option on the volume that you share with your older Macs, and see if that makes a difference. See the manual page: https://netatalk.io/oldstable/htmldocs/AppleVolumes.default.5 Tip: Use the netatalk2 webmin module to facilitate the editing...
  15. rdmark

    Netatalk Issues

    Absolutely, happy to help! One option when starting from scratch is to use the official Docker containers on Docker Hub: https://hub.docker.com/u/netatalk If your host OS has AppleTalk in the kernel, and Avahi with D-Bus, the netatalk2 image should work fully out of the box. Worth a try I think!
  16. rdmark

    Netatalk Issues

    There is a one-way migration path from netatalk2 to netatalk3 as documented in https://netatalk.io/stable/htmldocs/upgrade … but unless you have precious data you absolutely must retain, you should just purge the other version and start over from scratch. If your focus is Classic Mac OS, then...
  17. rdmark

    Netatalk Issues

    Would you be able to show us the contents of your afpd.conf and AppleVolumes.default config files? This might help understand why #2 is happening. AppleDouble folders should have a dot prefix and be hidden by default, but you may have overridden that behavior in your configuration...
  18. rdmark

    Netatalk 2.3.0 available

    A stable Netatalk 2.3.2 release has been tagged and released now: https://github.com/Netatalk/netatalk/releases/tag/netatalk-2-3-2 All of the recent feedback and bug reports from the community should have been resolved now. One last minute breaking change: I renamed the macOS launchd daemon...
  19. rdmark

    Netatalk 2.3.0 available

    Out of curiosity: What exactly does the HyperCard event handling do with AFP, and how do you use it in your decks? I'd like to learn more about how Netatalk fits into this use case! AppleShare IP is an AFP server using TCP/IP as the transport layer, as opposed to DDP (AppleTalk) with...
  20. rdmark

    Netatalk 2.3.0 available

    Is AppleTalk mandatory for your use case? AppleShare IP is much easier to serve over the internet, obviously. @Byte Knight didn't you run a community AppleShare server at some point?