Modding the Kodak Reels 8mm Film Digitizer (Firmware Hack)

CDenhart

New Tinkerer
Jul 26, 2025
4
0
1
Hi,
my Kodak is probably very bad. Even the color film started to skip. It makes a strange clicking sound when scanning and at that moment the image skips. I'm thinking of returning it, but there is a problem with that. I uploaded modified firmware to it and I can't return it in this state.
Could someone who has a backup of the original firmware C from version 2.0 send it to me? Versions A and B probably wouldn't work, because the ones here don't work either.
Thank you very much for your help.
View attachment 22657
There is original Version C firmware linked in the lookup tool page from the first post, in the path "Option 3 - Original Firmware for C/Kodak FW for H2324148BK Series". Also, I posted the FW I found on my C-device in post #511. They are different, maybe based on the region the device was sold. Mine type ends with "EU", probably bc I bought it at a German vendor.
 

ThePhage

New Tinkerer
Oct 30, 2024
16
8
3
Hi,
my Kodak is probably very bad. Even the color film started to skip. It makes a strange clicking sound when scanning and at that moment the image skips. I'm thinking of returning it, but there is a problem with that. I uploaded modified firmware to it and I can't return it in this state.
Could someone who has a backup of the original firmware C from version 2.0 send it to me? Versions A and B probably wouldn't work, because the ones here don't work either.
Thank you very much for your help.
View attachment 22657
I have had such skipping and sounds on film that shrunk over the decades and doesn't align well with the advancing mechanism. Not sure that it is a defect in the Kodak.
 

omega

New Tinkerer
Jul 29, 2025
10
1
3

CDenhart

Thank you for trying to help me. I've tried the firmware from the link before. Some didn't work and left only red spots on the screen. Some worked just like yours, but they all had the same defect. The opening image was different from my original. So the way back to the seller is closed and I won't try it again.

TheFage

I noticed that some of the film was twisted, probably because it was cut incorrectly. Holding the door slightly open helped a little. The film went smoother. I'll try putting softer springs under the pressure plates, that might help. Someone mentioned it here already.
 

sebastien2b

New Tinkerer
Mar 29, 2025
2
5
3
I’ve read the entire thread, and I want to thank all the contributors who worked on modifying the scanner. Honestly, you guys are legends.


I had a question regarding the choice of the 12 mm lens. Was that a deliberate optical decision, or more like “that’s what I had on hand, I tested it and it worked”? I tried running some calculations on my end to see if using an 8 mm lens, for example, could make it possible to avoid modifying the lens mount and do a direct replacement instead.

ex : https://www.edmundoptics.com/p/10mm-fl-f25-blue-series-m12-mu-videotrade-imaging-lens/15120/


Has anyone already tested other solutions?


Thanks to all of you!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mac84

Umba67

New Tinkerer
Dec 4, 2024
6
3
3
View attachment 20263
3D printed the lens offset. Attached is more model for the 3D print. Now my frames in focus and not skewed. There is even space between the lens, and the open film loading door.

V4.2 (Type C) still occasional saw a buffer collision between the compression data, and the second input frame buffer. This firmware should address that.

While my hardware hack is about done, there are still quality improvements to achieve. In this example, some damaged film jammed the feeder, but when the frame was held the quality went up.

View attachment 20269
So difference between the frame is hurting the quality.

When the grain was different between compressed frames, the image is blurred, particular when the scene lack contrast:
View attachment 20271

But when the frame isn't moving, there is significantly more details (this is the grain I want in every frame.) View attachment 20270

This could be a QP factor for P frames? Any ideas on what this could be?
Hello 0dan0, can you please tell me the code of the new screws for the new height?
I've ordered the 3D Lens spacer. I guess they have to be 5+7 long, but I have no clue about the pitch and depth of the screw threads. Thank you.
IMG_1682.JPG
 

0dan0

Active Tinkerer
Jan 13, 2025
147
284
63
I’ve read the entire thread, and I want to thank all the contributors who worked on modifying the scanner. Honestly, you guys are legends.


I had a question regarding the choice of the 12 mm lens. Was that a deliberate optical decision, or more like “that’s what I had on hand, I tested it and it worked”? I tried running some calculations on my end to see if using an 8 mm lens, for example, could make it possible to avoid modifying the lens mount and do a direct replacement instead.

ex : https://www.edmundoptics.com/p/10mm-fl-f25-blue-series-m12-mu-videotrade-imaging-lens/15120/


Has anyone already tested other solutions?


Thanks to all of you!

I tried about 10 lenses, mostly cheap 12-16mm lenses, and optically the this range would provide a better crop. However, all the other lenses failed to achieve a near focus. So what is needed is a macro lens, designed for a short focus distance. Macro lens are generally wider, a 12mm macro in the M12 format appears to be rare, although Scorpion has some 16mm macros that may also work.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mac84 and Umba67

Mac84

Administrator
Staff member
Founder
Sep 4, 2021
255
323
63
New Jersey, USA
www.mac84.net
I think you can rule out type A, these are the oldest, and very unlikely to be sold as new anywhere. My one Type A was still called "Reelz" not "Reels", well until I firmware updated it. I would think most new units are Type C, so I would try type C first, then B. The 8mmlookup should be updated with information from more recent serial numbers.

Sadly Kodak no longer has any firmware updates on their website. 😥 This is where the original serial number matrix / data was pulled from to estimate the version numbers. Without more information the crude lookup tool I made cannot be updated... unless someone decodes the serial numbers further, etc.

Hi,
my Kodak is probably very bad. Even the color film started to skip. It makes a strange clicking sound when scanning and at that moment the image skips. I'm thinking of returning it, but there is a problem with that. I uploaded modified firmware to it and I can't return it in this state.
Could someone who has a backup of the original firmware C from version 2.0 send it to me? Versions A and B probably wouldn't work, because the ones here don't work either.
Thank you very much for your help.
View attachment 22657

A lot of these units have very poor hardware inside. I had one that was 1 month old where the motor died. They are cheaply made and you may have gotten a lemon. If it's still within the return or warranty period, I'd consider those options.

Try removing the take-up reel and seeing if that removes the problem. A lot of Reels/Wolverine users have used plastic containers to collect the film in, as the tension from the take-up reel can cause issues or even tearing of the film.

The firmware won't change the issue, but "Option 3" linked here has the original FW file for "C" model units. You can use my lookup tool for more information.

Edit: Sorry, I didn't see your reply above.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Umba67

omega

New Tinkerer
Jul 29, 2025
10
1
3
hi,
I was considering returning it, that's why I was looking for the original firmware. I've tried probably all the ones here, but none of them have the same start screen. So I ruled out this option.
As someone else wrote here, I tried polishing the film pressure plates and loosened the screws holding them about 1/4 turn. This reduced friction and the film jumps a lot less. The picture also shows the printed SuperContrast, which is available for download from "0dan0".
The take-up reel has little power. The film is quite loose on it, so that won't cause the jumps.
Of all the firmware versions here, I can't decide whether to use 5.8 or the latest 6.6. Both pictures are with the basic settings.
 

Attachments

  • tlak.jpg
    tlak.jpg
    69 KB · Views: 8
  • oba.jpg
    oba.jpg
    121.5 KB · Views: 8

0dan0

Active Tinkerer
Jan 13, 2025
147
284
63
hi,
I was considering returning it, that's why I was looking for the original firmware. I've tried probably all the ones here, but none of them have the same start screen. So I ruled out this option.
As someone else wrote here, I tried polishing the film pressure plates and loosened the screws holding them about 1/4 turn. This reduced friction and the film jumps a lot less. The picture also shows the printed SuperContrast, which is available for download from "0dan0".
The take-up reel has little power. The film is quite loose on it, so that won't cause the jumps.
Of all the firmware versions here, I can't decide whether to use 5.8 or the latest 6.6. Both pictures are with the basic settings.
6.6 has a user controllable white-balance added to the menu, so you can set the look more as you need (5.8 was a fixed WB with aggressive red gain 1.75,1,1.)