Modding the Kodak Reels 8mm Film Digitizer (Firmware Hack)

VoodooKi

New Tinkerer
Oct 26, 2025
4
0
1
How can I tell if the firmware update was successfully installed? After performing the Firmware B update, my startup screen still shows the regular Kodak logo. My serial number is D2825148BK00952. I used a SanDisk Ultra 16 GB card, formatted it to FAT32, and placed only the FWDV280.bin file on the SD card. The boot process took approximately 10–20 seconds. I’ve also tried all three options. Also, I just bought this new off of Amazon.
 

TheElk

New Tinkerer
Oct 5, 2025
31
1
8
I was out this week and tested last saturday with V6.9. I found sufficent color settings for Kodachrome from the 70 s. 448, 256, 256 ev 2 ( White bal 2,0 -1,5 -0,5 ). Only the issue after 16384 frames existed. Now we have the new V7.1.1 with the possibility to choose also 24fps ( over 95 % of my films are in 24fps ) what makes it getting rid of cutting and reframing. I love this, many thanks. Today I did 2 short scans with the new version. I believe I have to test with additional settings for the Kodachrome tomorrow. 528, 256, 256 ( White bal 1 -1.5 -0.5 ) was my last test. It was too green. But this was the setting which showes a good histogram with an empty Kodakfilm, but not within the film.
Tomorrow I will also check, if the 16384 Problem has gone away ...
 

0dan0

Active Tinkerer
Jan 13, 2025
238
405
63

0dan0

Active Tinkerer
Jan 13, 2025
238
405
63
How can I tell if the firmware update was successfully installed? After performing the Firmware B update, my startup screen still shows the regular Kodak logo. My serial number is D2825148BK00952. I used a SanDisk Ultra 16 GB card, formatted it to FAT32, and placed only the FWDV280.bin file on the SD card. The boot process took approximately 10–20 seconds. I’ve also tried all three options. Also, I just bought this new off of Amazon.
The boot screen, if updated, will show:
BootLogo1600x1200-V7.1B.png


I've only used 32GB cards with stand formatting (defaults to FAT32.) If is very new, it likely Type C.
 

VoodooKi

New Tinkerer
Oct 26, 2025
4
0
1
Well now you know you are installing firmware. :) So Type B it is.
Thanks, I’ll go back to Type B then.
I’m trying to convert my grandfather’s films for the family and want to make sure I can give them the best quality possible. I have 15 reels from the early 1960s, and I’m guessing they haven’t been used in decades. I’ve ordered some PEC-12 to clean the film is there anything else I should do?
Here’s the MediaInfo for Type B:
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2025-10-26 224343.png
    Screenshot 2025-10-26 224343.png
    501.4 KB · Views: 21
  • Screenshot 2025-10-26 224551.png
    Screenshot 2025-10-26 224551.png
    25.8 KB · Views: 25

ThePhage

New Tinkerer
Oct 30, 2024
25
20
3
Thanks, I’ll go back to Type B then.
I’m trying to convert my grandfather’s films for the family and want to make sure I can give them the best quality possible. I have 15 reels from the early 1960s, and I’m guessing they haven’t been used in decades. I’ve ordered some PEC-12 to clean the film is there anything else I should do?
Here’s the MediaInfo for Type B:
I found success with using Pec Pads and Film Guard solution to gently clean dust/dirt from the film before scanning, while also lubricating it. Some film didn’t need it as much as others (those that had been screened more often).

I did use Pec 12, but for cleaning the film path on the scanner.

Compressed air was occasionally helpful to blow dirt out of the gate while scanning as needed.

Also, decide on a system to organize and label the footage and files. A spreadsheet with any data you can assemble would be wise.

On my next round of scanning (with the awesomeness that is 7.1.1 or later) I may borrow from someone up thread who put cotton or spec pads on the scanners’s grey film guide posts to keep those from scratching the film.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VoodooKi

0dan0

Active Tinkerer
Jan 13, 2025
238
405
63
Thanks, I’ll go back to Type B then.
I’m trying to convert my grandfather’s films for the family and want to make sure I can give them the best quality possible. I have 15 reels from the early 1960s, and I’m guessing they haven’t been used in decades. I’ve ordered some PEC-12 to clean the film is there anything else I should do?
Here’s the MediaInfo for Type B:
That looks like Mac84 firmware, not 0dan0 v7.1. The original firmware hack didn't modify the boot logo, that is way you didn't see any change on the firmware update.

Other big differences: resolution at 1920x1440 (not 1600x1200, remember the stock lens can only resolve ~640x480, more resolution is not always better), bitrate is lower (not 35Mb/s), and 20fps is the stock framerate (not an 8mm or Super8 fps.) The v7.1 firmware has a lot of additional fixes, more stable exposure and a manual white balance control. My firmware also updates the date to 2025-10-22.

1761541196780.png


Attached is the latest Type B firmware if you want the above and more.
 

Attachments

  • FWDV280-TypeB-V7.1.1-0dan0.zip
    5.5 MB · Views: 22
Last edited:

ThePhage

New Tinkerer
Oct 30, 2024
25
20
3

A User Guide and Reference to 0Dan0's Custom Firmware​

Created: October 27, 2025
Last Revised: October 30, 2025
Most Recent Firmware: v7.1.1

Preamble​

The purpose of this post is to provide a user guide and reference document for 0Dan0's custom firmware for the Kodak Reels Film Digitizer. This post will be revised for clarity and accuracy, and will also be edited as further revisions to 0Dan0's firmware are released. Please private message me if you have corrections, suggestions or requests for the cotents of this guide. This guide will not include specific information regarding the hardware modifications that are also being made to this scanner, such as lens replacements.

Required Reading on Previous Firmware Work​

While the entire contents of this thread may be too overwhelming to read, please consider reading over Mac84's initial post for some helpful context to this overall effort, primarily around Mac84's custom firwmare. Particularly relevant, is information regarding the different versions of the Kodak Reels (A, B, C, etc). If you wish to make any firmware adjustments to your Kodak Reels Scanner, you will need to identify which version of the scanner you have.

Changing the Firmware on your Scanner​

Warning: As with any firmware adjustment, exercise caution when changing the firmware. While uncommon, permanent damage can occur during a change of the firmware (for example, removing power from unit during firmware adjustment).

(section to be added later)



The User Guide

On-Screen Display: With the scanner in capture mode, an informational display is overlayed in the bottom left corner of the screen including the following components:
  • RGB Histogram (useful for evaluating exposure and color, Wiki Article)
  • White Balance (WB) RGB values (adjustable)
  • ISO & Exposure (Exp) statistics
  • Frame Count & Auto Exposure bias value (ev, adjustable)
  • FPS (frames per second, adjustable)

Controls

Note: some of these controls use the On-Screen Menu system, while others are simply adjusted with the scanners buttons before and/or during capture

White Balance (In Menu): You can manually adjust the Red/Blue color values of your image
  • Up (toward red)
  • Down (toward blue)
  • Cannot be adjusted during capture
  • A value of 0 is generally neutral, based on the LED-sourced backlight.

Green Tint (Not in Menu): decrease or increase the green color value of your image
  • Press the < or > (left or right arrow) buttons to adjust before and during capture
  • The Green value is the second of the 3 color values listed on the display
  • 256 is the default “neutral” value
  • Adjusts in 15 steps (-7 to +7) from 144 to 368 (see bottom for list of values)
  • Not to be confused with the erroneously labelled In-Menu Tint control (see 'Saturation' below, to be corrected in future release)

Auto Exposure Bias (Not in Menu): The firmware attempts to choose the best exposure, but you can adjust the Auto Exposure Bias to your preference.
  • During capture press the + or - buttons
  • Adjust only during capture (need to verify if still accurate)
  • The 'ev' value on the display changes from -7 to +7
  • If you desire brighter exposure, increase the Exposure Bias
  • If you desire darker exposure, decrease the Exposure Bias

Saturation (In Menu, but erroneously labelled as “Tint” by manufacturer - to be corrected in future release).
  • 0 is "normal" color value
  • +2 increases the color beyond normal
  • -2 is no color (for scanning black and white film)
  • Not reflected in the RGB values on the On-Screen Display

Frame Adjust (In Menu): Adjust the framing and zoom to achieve desired framing of the image.
  • In Firmware v(unknown) 0Dan0 adjusted this to allow for Zooming further wide than stock firmware allowed

Frame Rate (Not in Menu): 16, 18, or 24 frames per second.
  • Long Press the Up or Down arrows before or during capture to adjust
  • Setting will be remembered after unit shutdown
  • Adjust before or during capture
  • Is not written to the file until the capture is stopped
  • 8mm film is 16 or 18 fps; Super8 film is 18 or 24 fps

Other Non-controllable features of this firmware:
  • File resolution of 1600x1200 (actual resolving capability is dependant upon lens configuration)
  • Bitrate with Peak Qp at ~35 Mb/s
  • Disabled 3DNR (preserving some detail and rendering of film grain)
  • Full Range fix (metadata in the MP4 file specifying Full Range vs Broadcast range)
  • Auto Stop (stops capture when it detects that no film is being scanned -- like at the end of a reel)
  • Custom Boot/Shutdown graphic displaying features, instructions, version number and firwmare release date
  • Resulting folder/file naming to include firmware date/version (verify this)




Version History​

(currently incomplete, to be revised/clarified in future)

v7.1.1 Release Notes
Oct 21, 2025

  • Exposure: Went back to ISO 100-400, as was seeing more exposure stepping with ISO 50.
  • White balance: 0 is now normalized to color of the backlight.
  • FPS: is now selectable between 16, 18 and 24fps. Long hold on up or down, arrows to increase or decrease the frame rate. You will be remembered, and can be changed during capture, as the value is only used when the capture is stopped.
Note: v7.1 was quickly replaced by 7.1.1 to fix the adjustable frame rate feature



v7.0 Release Notes
Oct. 20, 2025
  • Added auto exposure back into preview
  • Added ISO 50 back to the exposure range
  • Added Tint -2.0 is now true B&W
Comment: Let me know if you seeing much jitter in 7.0, as the preview auto exposure was originally disabled to reduce jitter. Now the preview auto exposure biases to a short shutter, hopefully to achieve the same jitter reduction. I'm not seeing any jitter my brief testing.



v6.9 Release Notes
Oct. 15, 2025
All updated to V6.9, types A, B and C.

Comment: I reduced the EV range to be more subtle, so larger values might be required. I was reacting to this comment "EV1 is a little to dark, ev 2 is too bright". EV +2 now more is like the last EV +1. This does not make the scan brighter or darker directly, instead it biases the input to the auto exposure. As the exposure logic tries to limit unnecessary brightness changes, it is more intended for a scene change, some EV values may no appear to change the brightness, this is normal. You can trick the unit into thinking there is a scene change by temporarily placing your finger between the camera and film.

V6.9 adds: Exposure stats (to the LCD), Green Tint < or > (buttons) and EV bias + or - buttons in capture.

Relevant Discussion:
jackmonte1987 said: Thank you so much 0dan0 , Now I get back to scanning. I just want to clarify, when you say EV you are talking about the green tint using the left and right arrows correct? Would 0 be considered default or "untouched". Also will this fw update fix my stuck setting? I know you had said that the settings will remain even despite a fw change.​

0Dan0 response: No, green tint for white balance is < and > buttons, EV (exposure bias) is new, and use + and - buttons, but only during capture. These are explained (so briefly) on the boot screen. There is no correct setting, just what looks good to you.​




(Previous versions to be added later)




Green Tint Value Reference​


144 = -7 (Decreased Green, toward Magenta)
160 = -6
176 = -5
192 = -4
208 = -3
224 = -2
240 = -1
256 = 0 (neutral)
272 = +1
288 = +2
304 = +3
320 = +4
336 = +5
352 = +6
368 = +7 (Increased Green, away from Magenta)
 
Last edited:

TheElk

New Tinkerer
Oct 5, 2025
31
1
8
No more issues ( histogram disappears, black lines in the stored frames ) with reels having over 16384 frames ( reels bigger than 5 inch - ca 67 meters S8 ).
Thank you @0dan0 so much. Now I can start my second round of scanning all my material and have much less work to do in postprocessing which I stopped in August.
 

TheElk

New Tinkerer
Oct 5, 2025
31
1
8
It seems, that I'm recognising something mysterious. I'm scanning one film after an other. After some films I switch off the scanner, take out the SD card, copy the files from the card, erase them on the card, put the card back in the scanner and turn on the scanner again. There is no film in, the color settings are changing, I can see that in the little histogram. OK. He adjusts. I hadn't changed the White bal and green yet. I recognised, that the first value stays always like it was at switch off time. I believe, same to the last value, but the middle value often changes. I hat 256, after switching on it goes to 324 or so.

Second mysteria : I recognized, that in dark shots there was a shine on the capture from the sprocket hole. So I had an inserted film, went back the frame adjust with down arrow five times, checked the scanning window, putted it 2 times more left, went back with up arrow five times. I repeated the back-forth-left adjustment a second time and went back to the recording setting. I also recognised, that the middle value in the histogram was changed, from 256 to 224.

That means be careful if you have many films of the same historic time and vendor and want to scan them all with the same adjustment ( because you figured out that it fits best ) and check if the settings have not changed for every new scan.
 
Last edited:

0dan0

Active Tinkerer
Jan 13, 2025
238
405
63
It seems, that I'm recognising something mysterious. I'm scanning one film after an other. After some films I switch off the scanner, take out the SD card, copy the files from the card, erase them on the card, put the card back in the scanner and turn on the scanner again. There is no film in, the color settings are changing, I can see that in the little histogram. OK. He adjusts. I hadn't changed the White bal and green yet. I recognised, that the first value stays always like it was at switch off time. I believe, same to the last value, but the middle value often changes. I hat 256, after switching on it goes to 324 or so.

Second mysteria : I recognized, that in dark shots there was a shine on the capture from the sprocket hole. So I had an inserted film, went back the frame adjust with down arrow five times, checked the scanning window, putted it 2 times more left, went back with up arrow five times. I repeated the back-forth-left adjustment a second time and went back to the recording setting. I also recognised, that the middle value in the histogram was changed, from 256 to 224.

That means be careful if you have many films of the same historic time and vendor and want to scan them all with the same adjustment ( because you figured out that it fits best ) and check if the settings have not changed for every new scan.
Yes, as the firmware is re-using the left and right buttons for green tint, any longish presses while framing may also alter the tint. I should probably make the green tint presses longer.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: ThePhage

0dan0

Active Tinkerer
Jan 13, 2025
238
405
63
My lenses order form RMA ELECTRONICS arrived. The AZURE-1228MAC is confirmed to be same lens as the one from Scorpion. The secondary experiment with at 16mm AZ-231622S-MAC hasn't worked, I couldn't get a focus at this short distance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: eyeidea

sheider

New Tinkerer
Oct 17, 2025
12
5
3
My lenses order form RMA ELECTRONICS arrived. The AZURE-1228MAC is confirmed to be same lens as the one from Scorpion. The secondary experiment with at 16mm AZ-231622S-MAC hasn't worked, I couldn't get a focus at this short distance.
That's definitely good news about the 12mm lens being a match, but bad news about the 16mm lens. @0dan0 Do you still have any hope of finding a lens that could get good focus, good coverage, and good resolution, given the short focal length of the Reels' design?
 

0dan0

Active Tinkerer
Jan 13, 2025
238
405
63
That's definitely good news about the 12mm lens being a match, but bad news about the 16mm lens. @0dan0 Do you still have any hope of finding a lens that could get good focus, good coverage, and good resolution, given the short focal length of the Reels' design?
The 12mm is a really good fit, with some overscan. A 12mm macro like this one, should have been the original choice for this hardware. For the active picture is so near 1080p. It would be extremely unlikely that 16mm macro, with no overscan would work in this range, without being a custom lens design.
 

Rob_A

New Tinkerer
Jul 13, 2025
2
1
1
My lenses order form RMA ELECTRONICS arrived. The AZURE-1228MAC is confirmed to be same lens as the one from Scorpion. The secondary experiment with at 16mm AZ-231622S-MAC hasn't worked, I couldn't get a focus at this short distance.
I've been collecting my thoughts for some comments and queries about the updated firmware and use of the Kodak Reels in general, but this discussion of alternative lenses prompts me to jump in now with a specific question that seems relevant. 0dan0 unhappily reports that "16mm AZ-231622S-MAC hasn't worked, I couldn't get a focus at this short distance". Might it not be possible to achieve focus at a closer distance by adding a supplementary lens? Back in the sixties I used a 1 dioptre "close-up" lens on my Sankyo 8mm camera when shooting animation. Similarly a 2 dioptre supplementary on my 35mm Voigtlander enabled me to copy prints etc. at a shorter distance than the standard (fixed) lens allowed. Granted that we're now considering a MUCH shorter distance than in those cases I suppose that in principle it might be possible to come up with a supplementary that would appropriately reduce the focusing range of the 16mm lens. Others with more knowledge of optics will be better able to calculate the required spec for such a lens, but it seems to me that it might be a feasible solution. Obviously any additional glassware potentially degrades the achievable quality by some margin, but maybe not enough to offset the advantage of an optimised field of view?

This thread has been an invaluable resource while I've been getting to grips with my "Kodak" Reels and I have to express my appreciation of all the contributors, particularly those responsible for the hugely impressive firmware and hardware enhancements. My scanner is as yet unmodified, until I have completed an initial digitisation of my family's 8mm archive (1958-82) but I hope that in due course I'll be able to take advantage of all that voluntary development work.