Hacking the Kodak Reels 8mm Film Digitizer (New Thread)

P-car

New Tinkerer
Dec 14, 2025
17
2
3
so, I just got my Kodak Reels and was able to get OdanO's firmware up and running. However, when I try to use the "framing" buttons, nothing happens. I try to zoom in and it does not respond, it also does not respond to left or right.

so, I shut it off and turned it back on, and when I did, the framing was zoomed in and to the left - as if it applied my adjustments .

I tried zooming out at this point and it did not respond.

has anyone else had this issue with framing?
 

P-car

New Tinkerer
Dec 14, 2025
17
2
3
My Kodak Reels arrived today with the red adapter attached to the left arm and the grey one attached to the right arm. However, my super 8 reels "center hole" are still too large. Do I need another adapter? please see image.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_9432.JPG
    IMG_9432.JPG
    39.5 KB · Views: 10

0dan0

Active Tinkerer
Jan 13, 2025
294
453
63
My Kodak Reels arrived today with the red adapter attached to the left arm and the grey one attached to the right arm. However, my super 8 reels "center hole" are still too large. Do I need another adapter? please see image.
That is not the adaptor. The red and grey posts are just classic 8mm style reel hubs. You need to attached this over the red post:
1765938390075.png
 

P-car

New Tinkerer
Dec 14, 2025
17
2
3
Darn. My unit did not come with the adapters. what are they called? maybe I can find them on AMAZON. If I cant find on AMAZON, where can I buy in USA? thanks
 

0dan0

Active Tinkerer
Jan 13, 2025
294
453
63
so, I just got my Kodak Reels and was able to get OdanO's firmware up and running. However, when I try to use the "framing" buttons, nothing happens. I try to zoom in and it does not respond, it also does not respond to left or right.

so, I shut it off and turned it back on, and when I did, the framing was zoomed in and to the left - as if it applied my adjustments .

I tried zooming out at this point and it did not respond.

has anyone else had this issue with framing?
Framing is likely working after the reboot.
 

P-car

New Tinkerer
Dec 14, 2025
17
2
3
OdanO. thank you so much. I'm going also print the parts for the lens MOD. can you suggest a good online 3d print store. I've not done 3d prints in a while.
 

Mac84

Administrator
Staff member
Founder
Sep 4, 2021
298
422
63
New Jersey, USA
www.mac84.net
Why did twenty people (so far) download NewNtkTools2025.zip, this is for developers to "customize firmware". I was just sharing a change to one the tools I'm using, I only expected maybe Mac84, and one other to try it. If there are more out there want to try extending the firmware, let me know and I can show the steps I'm using. Now that serval hacks are in C, it might be little easier for others to try.
Thanks for posting that!

Perhaps my call to action in my video persuaded some lurkers to inspect the code... 😅 You should totally record a screen recording of you explaining your work or something similar and post it. Even though I'm not a programmer I'd watch that!

It also reminds me, I wonder what would happen if a higher capacity memory chip was soldered to the Kodak board... I know you previously mentioned some of the mods had to remove other things to make room. Although I suppose the firmware would have to be aware of such extra space to take advantage of it.
 

sheider

New Tinkerer
Oct 17, 2025
20
7
3
Now most of the time I do not see the artifact, although we did a short film a couple of weekends ago (7 rolls for Ektachrome,) and there was only one moment when I saw this error. But it reminded me to look into it.

I'm thinking of two firmware changes with this new insight.
1) displaying the current readout resolution. This will be sad for stock lens users, as you will see you resolution at around 672x504.
2) optionally encoding at the native readout window resolution (super depressing for a stock lens.) For 12mm users, at 1440x1080 native encode will eliminate any minor scaling artifacts.

Feedback on these ideas?
I like the transparency of idea #1... It will likely lead to many folks buying a 12mm macro lens (I have mine, but I still need to install it).

I have mixed feelings about idea #2... I like that any scaling artifacts would be eliminated for 12mm lens users at 1440x1080. I also like that it supports the digitization of a 16mm frame (even if the stock film gate does not). However, I'm sure that folks with the stock lens love that the 672x504 images are currently upscaled to 1600x1200. So, I'd like to see the following implemented as a compromise if possible:
a) encode at the native readout window resolution for 1440x1080 and higher
b) retain the 1600x1200 upscaling for native readout window resolutions below 1440 x 1080.

A variation of my "compromise" that I prefer (if feasible) is to make the encoding resolution user-configurable, providing those 2 encoding resolution setting options ('Native' and '1600x1200') regardless of the current readout resolution.

Thanks again for all that you continue to do to improve the quality of this device!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 0dan0

0dan0

Active Tinkerer
Jan 13, 2025
294
453
63
BootLogo1600x1200-V76A.png
BootLogo1600x1200-V76B.png
BootLogo1600x1200-V76C.png


Release V7.6

This adds info reporting the sensor read-out resolution, but leaves the encoding resolution at 1600x1200 for now. This is info is during preview only.
1766008673907.png

There is also the window offset, the number of x, y pixels from top left of the active sensor region. This could be useful for debugging.
Final change, during capture I have restored support for 50 ISO, so a slightly cleaner image (maybe).
 

Attachments

  • FWDV280-TypeA-V76-0dan0.zip
    5.5 MB · Views: 2
  • FWDV280-TypeB-V76-0dan0.zip
    5.5 MB · Views: 1
  • FWDV280-TypeC-V76-0dan0.zip
    5.5 MB · Views: 1

0dan0

Active Tinkerer
Jan 13, 2025
294
453
63
We currently DO NOT have control over ISO, correct? (the algo manages the iso.)
Correct. The range of film means the ISO needs to vary. The algorithm will aim for the lowest practical for the film's density.