Hacking the Kodak Reels 8mm Film Digitizer (New Thread)

0dan0

Active Tinkerer
Jan 13, 2025
297
462
63
Hi @0dan0 -- I have a couple observations / questions about the ISO / exposure algorithm.

v7.1 - v7.5: During capture with my 'C' unit, the highest ISO / exposure that I observed was ISO 200 / ~5970µs. I never observed an ISO of 400 during capture, even with a black image. Is that behavior consistent with your expectation / experience?

v7.6: During capture with my 'C' unit, the highest ISO / exposure that I observed was ISO 100 / ~5984µs. I never observed an ISO of 200 or 400 during capture, even with a black image. Is that behavior consistent with your expectation / experience?

I understand that you're aiming for the lowest practical ISO for the film's density, but I'm surprised that none of the thousands of feet of film that I've scanned with v7.1+ has triggered neither your highest coded ISO nor an exposure time exceeding 6000µs. If that is by design, then no worries... I just want to confirm that my unit isn't underexposing images due to a hardware malfunction or firmware bug.
The code can go to 400 in preview, but this might be bug. Use the histogram to judge the exposure.
 

rdesros

New Tinkerer
Aug 24, 2025
18
9
3
@0dan0 Quick update on version 7.6: I’m now getting a steady 25–27 Mbps with the stock lens. Sharpness set to -0.5. There’s still a bit of jitter at the bottom of the screen occasionally, but overall the capture quality is pretty good. This is using version A of Kodak Reel. Thx
 

P-car

New Tinkerer
Dec 14, 2025
21
3
3
fantastic!!

Ok, so to get 25-27 Mbps, I just set it to the lowest possible number - 15 for example - and let the also do the rest, correct?